COST vs MKC
By Alex · Tickerpine
Costco Wholesale Corporation vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated, side by side — the numbers that matter, in plain English. No “winner” hype; you decide.
| Metric | COST | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $952.54 | $51.05 |
| Market cap | $422.43B | $13.72B |
| P/E ratio | 47.8 | 8.5 |
| ROE | 29.15% | 24.73% |
| Profit margin | 3.01% | 21.91% |
| Revenue growth | 21.50% | 16.70% |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 3.76% |
| Beta | 0.87 | 0.64 |
Green = the more favorable figure for that metric (lower P/E, higher ROE, margin, growth and yield). Not a recommendation.
COST vs MKC in plain English
- COST is the bigger company — about 30.8× the market cap of MKC.
- MKC is cheaper on earnings (P/E 8.5 vs 47.8).
- COST earns a higher return on equity (29% vs 25%).
- COST is growing revenue faster (22% vs 17%).
- MKC has the higher dividend yield (3.76% vs 0.62%).
How would $1,000 have done in each?
COST return calculator
See what $1,000 in Costco Wholesale Corporation would be worth today.
MKC return calculator
See what $1,000 in McCormick & Company, Incorporated would be worth today.
Figures from public market data, may be delayed. Comparison is informational only — not investment advice.