COST vs MKC
By Alex · Tickerpine
Costco Wholesale Corporation vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated, side by side — the numbers that matter, in plain English. No “winner” hype; you decide.
| Metric | COST | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,003.32 | $48.12 |
| Market cap | $444.60B | $12.95B |
| P/E ratio | 48.3 | 8.7 |
| ROE | 28.40% | 22.62% |
| Profit margin | 3.04% | 19.39% |
| Revenue growth | 11.10% | 17.40% |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 3.99% |
| Beta | 0.87 | 0.64 |
Green = the more favorable figure for that metric (lower P/E, higher ROE, margin, growth and yield). Not a recommendation.
COST vs MKC in plain English
- COST is the bigger company — about 34.3× the market cap of MKC.
- MKC is cheaper on earnings (P/E 8.7 vs 48.3).
- COST earns a higher return on equity (28% vs 23%).
- MKC is growing revenue faster (17% vs 11%).
- MKC has the higher dividend yield (3.99% vs 0.59%).
How would $1,000 have done in each?
COST return calculator
See what $1,000 in Costco Wholesale Corporation would be worth today.
MKC return calculator
See what $1,000 in McCormick & Company, Incorporated would be worth today.
Figures from public market data, may be delayed. Comparison is informational only — not investment advice.