COST vs MNST
By Alex · Tickerpine
Costco Wholesale Corporation vs Monster Beverage Corporation, side by side — the numbers that matter, in plain English. No “winner” hype; you decide.
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,003.32 | $46.19 |
| Market cap | $444.60B | $90.49B |
| P/E ratio | 48.3 | 42.8 |
| ROE | 28.40% | 25.70% |
| Profit margin | 3.04% | 23.08% |
| Revenue growth | 11.10% | 20.20% |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 0.87 | 0.49 |
Green = the more favorable figure for that metric (lower P/E, higher ROE, margin, growth and yield). Not a recommendation.
COST vs MNST in plain English
- COST is the bigger company — about 4.9× the market cap of MNST.
- MNST is cheaper on earnings (P/E 42.8 vs 48.3).
- COST earns a higher return on equity (28% vs 26%).
- MNST is growing revenue faster (20% vs 11%).
- COST pays a dividend (0.59%) while the other effectively doesn't.
How would $1,000 have done in each?
COST return calculator
See what $1,000 in Costco Wholesale Corporation would be worth today.
MNST return calculator
See what $1,000 in Monster Beverage Corporation would be worth today.
Figures from public market data, may be delayed. Comparison is informational only — not investment advice.